The nation is bad, the nation is to do bad things, we will think about this idea.
In order for the state to protect the state, it imposes a draft system on the people. Even if the state wins the war, the people will be killed and will also be killed as perpetrators.
It is a bad thing to take away the lives of others that the state makes the people a bad thing of war.
In other words, the state is bad, the state does what is bad.
So, what should the people do?
The nations oppose each other and try to do war.
In that case, is not it that individuals have to make war with the individuals of the other country together with the war?
British BBC reports a ballistic missile fire drill of Sakata-shi
Many people are murdered if war begins.
I may be murdered, too.
Then you are going to add to armaments for war and will you be going to have a nucleus?
However, the action calls war together. In other words, an arms race grows big because other countries feel uneasy.
In other words, from the moment when nuclear attack was done in 1945, the country was not able to make war, I think so.
Therefore what would you do if attacked?
This is only an impracticable theory.
What should the important thing do to prevent the country from making war?
Now, North Korea is similar to Japan 70 years ago.
Japan 70 years ago has started a big war. Japan pushed the disaster to many people.
Current North Korea is similar to that, but there is one thing that is quite different. It's an atomic bomb.
70 years ago, the use of atomic bombs changed the quality of war.
The war between the countries makes each other country nonrecurable.